In recent years, there has been much discussion about the indebtedness of nations. This includes Finland, whose debt-to-GDP ratio is at a middle level compared to other Western countries, although it is rapidly increasing.
This debt accumulation can be attributed to a variety of reasons, but it is often due to the inability of politicians in government to make difficult decisions. In other words, choices that may be unpopular with citizens and whose alternative is to arrange matters by taking on debt, the repayment of which will be handled by future governments and, in the worst case, even by generations yet to be born.
In this regard, Finland is an interesting case, as the country's economic growth has been negligible since 2008, while government expenditures have rapidly increased under several administrations. Consequently, public debt in relation to GDP has risen from 28% to 55% in just fifteen years.
As a result of this development, the public sector is forced to allocate increasingly large sums of money to debt servicing rather than providing services to citizens. Finnish Finance Minister Riikka Purra (Finns Party) highlighted this issue with a few examples.
According to her, Finland’s interest expenses on state debt will be 3.5 billion euros next year. This amount is about 1.6 times the total expenditures of the Ministry of the Interior's administration of internal security. It is also larger than the state subsidies for basic services provided by all municipalities to their residents or half of the operational budget allocated annually to the Finnish Defense Forces.
It is hoped that these examples will awaken the political left in Finland—and in other countries as well—to the understanding that lax economic policies have negative consequences. And for the people who elect their leaders to realize that there are no free lunches, and that expanding public services beyond revenues will only lead to bigger problems.
It seems that the current conservative government in Finland has at least a reasonable understanding of this, based on the Finance Minister's statement. However, it is hoped that this understanding will continue with future governments as well, so that Finland’s economy can be put back on a sustainable footing, ensuring that public services can be maintained in the future.
Aiempia ajatuksia samasta aihepiiristä:
The difficult times for Finland's economy are coming to an end
Finns are backing the government making difficult decisions
Reducing taxes, enhancing export and paying the governmental debt
The indebtedness of nation states is entirely deliberate and intentional.
ReplyDeleteIt should be noted that the government does not matter, because the major parties of the left and right are pursuing the same agenda.
Even the presidents are in on it.
The aim is to increase the debt of the nation state so that it can no longer be paid, so that the nation state will hand over its reserves to cancel its debts. In Finland that would be, for example, mineral resources, forest reserves and water reserves.
The austerity measures we are seeing now are essentially a sham.
Health care, for example, was once handled almost satisfactorily. Then came the reform, which is much more expensive than before, so now, for reasons of economy, they are having to close sites, with the result that the level of service collapses compared to before, and is still more expensive than before.
So why not go back to the old model?
No way, because then no new debt would be created.