Most popular posts right now

Showing posts with label electricity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label electricity. Show all posts

21 April 2025

Will Fossil-Free Energy Turn Finland’s Economy Toward Growth?

One of the biggest international goals is to phase out fossil energy. That’s why it was interesting to note that 95 percent of Finland’s electricity production was based on fossil-free energy sources in 2024 — including nuclear, wind, hydro, and solar power, as well as renewable fuels.

Last year also marked a milestone: wind power surpassed hydropower to become the second largest source of electricity production. The only larger source is nuclear energy, which accounted for 38 percent of Finland’s electricity supply.

This development is not only excellent for climate action but also because fossil-free energy gives a competitive edge to investments that consume a lot of energy. For this reason, Finland is expected to attract a wide range of international investments in the coming years — from various data centers to fossil-free hydrogen production.

If and when these future promises are fulfilled, Finns will have reason to expect the national economy to finally embark on a path of growth. At the same time, Finland’s public finances could move toward balance — especially since the Finnish government has promised to implement reforms that support economic growth over the next two years.

24 May 2024

South Africa: life without a culture of maintenance

South Africa is an interesting anthropological and cultural subject of study. The country's economy was in excellent shape when the white minority rule transitioned to black majority governance.

For this reason, I have occasionally written (in Finnish) about the events in the country. And today, I will do so based on an Al Jazeera article about the situation in the country.

According to the "Pravda" of the Arab world, South Africa has had uninterrupted electricity distribution for 57 consecutive days, which is the longest continuous period in over two years. This is significant because, last year, power outages caused losses of up to 51 million dollars per day due to the closure of factories, offices, and shops, according to the country's central bank.

However, electricity problems are not the only challenge in this country of 62 million people. Decades of neglect in infrastructure maintenance and investment have also led to the deterioration of transportation networks and water supply. This may result in the African National Congress (ANC), which has been in power since 1994 – the end of apartheid – losing its parliamentary majority in next week's elections, according to opinion polls.

South Africa has a large public electricity producer, Eskom, which mainly operates outdated and poorly maintained coal power plants. These plants have also suffered from coal and copper thefts as well as corruption. As a result, President Cyril Ramaphosa had to declare a state of emergency last February, with power outages stretching up to 12 hours a day.

Since then, private investments in wind and nuclear power have emerged in South Africa, resulting in the private sector now producing about a third of South Africa's electricity. This partly explains the recent reduction in power outages.

Power outages have also prevented water treatment plants from using their pumps, leaving people without potable water. Additionally, according to Johannesburg's water utility, nearly half of all pipeline water is lost to leaks. This means 70 million liters of drinking water are wasted every day. The reason is the high age of municipal distribution systems: in Johannesburg, for example, they were designed between the World Wars.

Water utilities are also vulnerable to vandalism. Thieves take everything from metal parts to pumps and sell them onwards. And there is no such maintenance culture for infrastructure in South Africa as in Western countries. Even if there were, water utilities struggle to generate revenue because people cannot afford to pay.

South Africa's water situation might be helped by transitioning to a private water distribution system, similar to electricity. The same applies to South Africa's state-supported railway company, which has also been plagued by poor management and corruption allegations.

Last year, the dilapidated railways caused economic losses equivalent to up to 6 percent of the gross domestic product in 2023, according to the country's Ministry of Finance. And that's not all, as the public railway company recently warned that it cannot service its debt of 130 billion rand (7.2 billion dollars) without direct state aid. Therefore, President Ramaphosa has also hinted at the possibility of privatizing the rail transport sector.

* * *

Next week, South Africa will hold elections in a situation where the infrastructure is failing, and in addition, a third of the entire population and nearly half of all young people are unemployed, 56 percent of the entire population lives in poverty, and economic growth is non-existent (with a forecast of 0.9 percent growth for this year). At the same time, crime rates and corruption scandals are daily occurrences.

Last year, the country's debt-to-GDP ratio grew to 74 percent (in Finland, it's 75.8 percent!), and the current government has to use more than a fifth of its tax revenues to pay interest on the debt. This diverts money from other sectors – such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure.

Therefore, unemployment in the country needs to be reduced to increase revenues. Consequently, the next government – regardless of its composition – should focus on stimulating the economy and creating jobs. This could be achieved by offering incentives for private infrastructure investments, which would positively reflect on the country's export industry and other businesses.

It remains to be seen whether South Africa can rise from the decline it has been on for the last decade and a half under the ANC-led centralized economy. Or will its fate be to sink into a typical backwater of black Africa, where nothing works except corruption and crime?

Previous thoughts on the same topic: Should forbidden questions be answered or not? Corruption in Nigeria may affect Europe They want to wipe out from Finland what is good for Africa

12 February 2023

Towards green energy despite serious drawbacks

Finland is currently building a nuclear plant, which was expected to be ready by year 2009. According to the most recent news a new problem was noticed in the plant, and therefore its addition to an electricity network will be delayed even more. 

In spite of the huge delays - due to uncompromised safety needs - it is probable that the plant will be in full operation during the coming spring. And lifts the country to a self-sustainability in electricity. 

One of the solved problems in Finland is the final disposal of nuclear waste. That makes a distinction to all other countries in the world and gives the northern country a relative benefit in the people´s acceptability of nuclear power compared to other nations.  

In addition to nuclear power, Finland invests considerably in windmills. Their number has increased in few years so much that in January they produced almost equal amount of electricity as the nuclear plants (four old ones, and the one cited above, which is in test use). 

Therefore it can be expected that Finland will become a net producer of energy in near future - most of which will be green (composed of nuclear energy, wind power, bioenergy and hydropower). That should open a new avenue to the northern country to gain economic investments. And to increase the standard of living of its inhabitants in a sustainable way. 

20 November 2022

Strong statement or intellectual dishonesty in COP27?

A historical decision was made in COP27 meeting in Egypt. According to that, wealthy countries will pay for developing ones from damages attributable to the climatic change, which is considered to happen due to the wealthy nations.

The decision was made, and I can only accept it. I would, however, like to hear if developing countries are willing to give up those modern things, which were created along the development that led to the compensations decided. That is: vehicles, flights, internet, phones, electricity etc... 

I think that would be a great sign of their willingness to refuse from such a negative developments, that their innovators are expected to pay for their existence. In others words, staying in each nation´s own innovations would make a strong statement on their willingness to stick in a sustainable way of life. 

If no one shows any willingness to give up those harmful innovations, I am afraid that the decision of compensation made in the COP27 meeting looks like intellectual dishonesty and only a new way to transfer money from north to south. Which may or may not be well justified due to some other reasons.