Finnish Minister of Finance Riikka Purra (Finns Party) suggested today that the defense spending target for the military alliance NATO will be raised to three or even 3.5 percent of the member countries' gross domestic product. Such an increase would be quite high, as many European NATO countries have not previously reached the current two percent target.
However, Finland appears to be ready for such an increase, provided that the decisions are made in a way that the allocated funds are specifically directed towards enhancing the country’s military capability and addressing threats against Finland, as well as fulfilling identified defensive needs.
In practice, the Finnish military currently has the greatest needs in the development of ground forces, so investments will initially focus on that area. This is because Finland has recently or is currently investing heavily in both naval and air forces.
However, the extent of the military threat against Finland remains unknown, as it depends on the outcome of the war in Ukraine. If the outcome is such that Russia can interpret its aggression as having achieved any form of victory, the risk to Finland increases in proportion to the certainty of Russian military achievements.
For this reason, it is not in Finland's interest to support a resolution that would, for example, limit Ukraine's sovereignty, involve territorial concessions, or restrict its military capabilities. Unfortunately, it seems that such elements are included in President Donald Trump's plan for a ceasefire and permanent peace. Even more clearly, these elements are present in the demands that Vladimir Putin has set as conditions for his involvement.
Unfortunately, at the moment, it seems that Trump does not understand — or care — about the consequences of such peace for Russia’s neighboring states. Nor do European countries, due to their previous neglect of defense, possess the military strength to offer Ukraine an alternative or to pressure Russia to withdraw from Ukraine.
Therefore, the current phase of the peace process in Ukraine appears outright threatening to both Finland and other neighboring states of Russia. On the other hand, it ensures that the citizens of these countries have a strong will to enhance and strengthen their military defense capability.
Previous thoughts on the same topic:
Now It's Putin's Turn to Show His Hand
Shifting U.S. Foreign Policy Sparks Concerns in Estonia
Trump's Indecision Benefits Putin – Deadly Consequences for Ukraine
It's more or less obvious now Putin has totally failed his propaganda war in Finland. The parliament is more unified on this topic than any other. Both the historically Russia minded far left and the new populist right are unified in rejecting Putin's policies.
ReplyDeleteIt's not that Putin has not tried or that he doesn't have a Finnish speaking voice. It's just that the population has learned what kind dangerous warring sociopath Putin is, and we know we can't re-Finlandize and expect to keep independence.
Ukraine has learned of Putin the hard way, and many other European countries essentially look away.
Upping the defence bugdet is the right call now. Upping the European cooperation is another. This won't go away by inviting Putin into an OSCE lead Bara Bada Bastu.
As I have previously said, if Mr. Putin gets something he can call a victory, he will test the fifth protocol in the Baltics.
ReplyDeleteWe will see. Se vis pacem etc. Putin is a narcist so he could kill a million of his own for his whims.
Delete