Citizen Journalism, Free Speech, and EU Challenges

The text above is my thought that "As long as a society has a true freedom of speech it cannot be completely rotten. However, all totally rotten societies are lacking the true freedom of speech."

The text is placed there because Finns seem to have significant difficulties in accepting freedom of speech. The most recent example of this was provided by the Finnish Green Party, which has decided to leave the social media platform known as X.

According to the party, societal discussion on X is no longer relevant due to the systematic hate speech, conspiracy theories, and disinformation spreading on the platform. They are correct in that all three undeniably occur frequently on X. However, they are wrong in claiming that societal discussion is no longer relevant on that platform, as it has been conducted specifically, explicitly, and practically only there.

Sure, the world is full of social media platforms, but it is precisely on X where open societal discussion has taken place. And it is precisely there where anyone could directly comment on anyone else's posts and provide reasoning. Of course, this often happens in an inappropriate manner, but in my view, both political extremes have been especially guilty of this.

If the Finnish Greens and the broader political left leave X, there is a risk that societal discussion will revert to a time when each ideological group had its own insular forum, making fruitful dialogue—or achieving mutual understanding—practically impossible. And it might not be possible in the future either, not even in the utopian world of the Greens. 

* * *

This relates to the perspective of Finnish Commissioner Henna Virkkunen, who has stated that the EU can impose significant fines and penalties on X if the platform does not meet the Union's requirements. According to her, "In Europe, everyone has freedom of speech and opinion. However, X has a specific obligation, derived from our laws, to assess and mitigate systemic risks related to our electoral systems and public discourse."

Virkkunen's comment arose after X conducted an interview with Alice Weidel, the vice-chair of Germany's second most popular party, the AfD. However, under EU legislation, platforms are required to ensure that certain political views are not favored over others. In other words, the commissioner would like to compel X to also interview representatives of other German parties.

It remains to be seen whether Elon Musk will comply with such demands—or if he will allow others to organize similar interviews on their own, which could then be featured on X. From the perspective of freedom of speech, it would be beneficial if this were possible—after all, Musk himself has emphasized that X is a platform for citizen journalism, where everyone can create their own content.

Previous thoughts on the same topic:
Criticism from the Left Brought a Small Association’s Independence Day March into the Spotlight
Freedom of Speech in Danger
Finnish MEPs Saramo and Tynkkynen Engage in Social Media Clash Over Ukraine Support

Henna Virkkunen: Opportunist or Unsuitable Commissioner Candidate?

The so-called political far-right achieved a major electoral victory in the EU elections. At the same time, significant changes occurred in its organization, resulting in the formation of two fairly equally sized groups.

The parties belonging to the ECR share a common critical stance against Russian imperialism, a stance also found in other parliamentary groups. In contrast, the parties aligned with the PIE are either uncritical or outright supporters of Russian imperialism, aligning themselves with part of the far-left The Left group in this regard.

Among Finnish parties, the Finns Party is a member of the ECR and unequivocally supports Western values. This stance has been evident in both Finnish politics and a national public broadcaster's survey, which asked MEPs whether Hungary's presidency should be suspended due to Viktor Orbán's solo actions favoring Russia.

Among Finnish MEPs, an overwhelming majority - including the representative of the Finns Party - supported the suspension, but Elsi Katainen (Renew) and Henna Virkkunen (EPP) would allow Orbán to continue, and Katri Kulmuni (Renew) did not know how to respond. In this context, it is interesting that Henna Virkkunen is Finland's commissioner candidate.

The question, therefore, is whether Virkkunen's view diverged from that of other Finnish EPP members because she did not want to irritate the presiding country, or if she genuinely supported Orbán. If it was the former, her stance does not demonstrate even basic political integrity, but rather sole opportunism. If it was the latter, it raises the question of whether she is at all suitable as Finland's commissioner candidate.

Previous thoughts on the same topic:
A National Rally election victory does not mean that France will become like Finland under the Finns Party
Former President of Finland, Tarja Halonen, suggested that Ukraine should cede part of its territory
Daniel Freund demanded a ban to Viktor Orbán