The era of ISIS is ending in Syria, and now it is time to ensure that the arrival of caliphate citizens to Finland should be prevented. For that purpose, there is a precedent from UK, where nationality was revoked from a woman known as ISIS bride - although it is probable that this decision must be confirmed in court.
Today I also became aware of a case that should be taken as a warning by the Finnish politicians and layers. Namely, a former neo-Swedish ISIS-fighter had participated in a payback murder in our western neighbor, and was still so confused that he considered himself a hero worth of a medal.
Considering these (and many other) cases I believe that any sensible human being understands that the head of all members of an organization like ISIS have their heads so fully confused that their behavior is not regulated by normal code of behavior. Or at least not one that would be acceptable in Western countries.
Therefore it should be clear that our politicians and juridical experts should understand that we do not need any caliphate citizens in Finland. And least of them walking freely among normal people.
As this has hopefully become clear also to our prime minister and members of the government and parliament, they should understand that the most important task before the elections in this spring would be to protect normal people from these ISIS veterans that have completely mixed their heads by religious fanaticism. There is not a single reason to feel pity for them, as they have made their decisions in order to destroy us and our culture.
For the same reason their right for the citizenship is not equal to normal people´s right for a safe living and environment. That must be understood in the juridical system, that will confirm the solutions made by the politicians.
The ordinary people, on the other hand, should understand that it is their own benefit, if they will vote for political parties that have not assisted the mass arrival of islamic economic refugees during the last few years. Especially, they should understand that voting a critical candidate in a migration positive party is not enough as their net effect - due to group discipline - would not differ from any other politician in the same party.
Previous thoughts on the same topic:
A set of immigration-derived sexual crimes in a Finnish town
The Danish government proposed reforms for immigration policy
Rape statistics in Finland and Sweden are breaking prejudices
The original thought in Finnish:
Kalifaatin kansalaisten pääsy suomalaisten pariin on estettävä
As long as a society has a true freedom of speech it cannot be completely rotten. However, all totally rotten societies are lacking the true freedom of speech.
Most popular posts during the last 30 days
- Former President Donald Trump is Also the Upcoming President – But What Does It Mean?
- Should the Dutch Do Something About the Fact That Immigrants Don't Tolerate Visiting Jews?
- The Fall of Germany’s Government Could Open the EU’s Path to a Better Future
- From Finland to Olaf Scholz: The Imperative of Supporting Ukraine's Independence instead of its Finlandization
- Nordic Nations Unite Against the Growing Threat of Cross-Border Organized Crime
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are free to comment on the blog posts, but I ask you to stay on topic and adhere to respectful language and good manners.