The pressure on Sanna Marini is growing, but will she and/or the government resign?? In Finnish, but translatable by google translator.
As long as a society has a true freedom of speech it cannot be completely rotten. However, all totally rotten societies are lacking the true freedom of speech.
Most popular posts during the last 30 days
- A Finnish MP Resigned After Straining Finland-Russia Relations
- Criticism from the Left Brought a Small Association’s Independence Day March into the Spotlight
- Mediterranean Taxi Service is Coming to an End
- A Major Victory for the Freedom Party in Austria's Regional Elections
- Anecdotes and Jokes About Vladimir Putin
27 August 2022
The beautiful PM of Finland has driven herself into a trouble
The pressure on Sanna Marini is growing, but will she and/or the government resign?? In Finnish, but translatable by google translator.
26 August 2022
Increase of violence by youngsters in Finnish towns
Did police have the right to strip women
Riots in Sweden: what next?
A set of immigration-derived sexual crimes in a Finnish town
20 August 2022
Tradition of low professional ability among Russian security agency and dictators
According to the Washington Post, the Russian Federal Security Service misinformed Vladimir Putin prior to his decision to attack Ukraine. According to its poor evaluation, the war would be over in a very short time.
To us in Finland, there was nothing new. It was the security service of Soviet Union that informed dictator Josif Stalin in 1939, that Russian army would be able to march to Helsinki - the capitol of Finland - in just few weeks. Based on that Stalin ordered his army to conquer Finland. As a result, they lost 126 875–167 976 soldiers as dead or missing as well as 188 671–207 538 as wounded or sick and 5 572 as captured. And as a result, the Russian attack in 1939 pushed Finland to join the German invasion to Russia in 1941.
So its seems that Russian security agencies have a tradition of exceptionally poor professional skills and their dictators poor understanding on the willingness of their neighboring nations to defend themselves. Surprisingly, dictator Putin had not even learned his lesson from 1939. I would call this utter stupidity.
Previous thoughts on the same topic:
How can Vladimir Putin survive from his propaganda after the Russian loss in Ukraine?
Is President Putin on his way to repeat the destiny of Czar Nicholas II?
Military specialist: Russian plan in Ukraine was incredibly poor
13 August 2022
Scientific misconduct on prevailing theories is too attractive
University of Delaware (UD) found one of its scientists guilty of research misconduct. She has committed fabrication and falsification in work on fish behavior and coral reefs. The university is going to retract three of her research papers, including one in the Science magazine, one of the leading scientific journals of the world.
The retracted papers reported worrisome results how Earth’s rising carbon dioxide levels would have dramatic effects on fish behavior and ecology. In other words, the results strongly supported the current fears of extremely harmful outcome of the climatic warming.
It should be understood that - after this case - the scientific community should conduct a serious introspection about its practices. In this process a special attention should be put on the critical assessment on the results supporting the prevailing theories of each time.
The scientific picture on each topic consists of theories from which testable hypotheses are derived. In this structure the most important feature is that even a single falsifying result may prove the hypothesis wrong - and as a consequence, also the theory behind that.
However, when talking about prevailing and politically important theories - such as the global change - it is easy to note leading journals to eagerly publish reports that support such theories. Thus, for a dishonest researcher the most attractive way to advance her career is to report fictitious but worrisome reports on observations on the effects of the climatic change. Exactly that seems to have happened with the current case mentioned above.
Therefore I propose that manuscripts reporting highly expected - but dramatic - results on the most popular scientific theory of each time are considered with a special suspicion in both the review process as well as in editorial decisions. After all, as I noted above, they are not important for the scientific process compared to falsifying reports.
Previous thoughts on the same topic:
Heat wave in Europe contrasts with the coldness of the Arctic sea
Should forbidden questions be answered or not?
A new justification is needed for environmental activists
8 August 2022
Military service to overthrow Mr. Putin
6 August 2022
Most useless organisations of our time
4 August 2022
The reasons behind the fall of Nokia´s cellphone business
Microbial solution to malnutrition?
Vikings and the technological cutting edge
Voisikohan olla... (my view about Nokia during its ongoing fall - in Finnish but google translatable, year 2010)